AI Review
Structured analysis of an external document by an AI model. Prompt and metadata are documented. Every analysis is traceable and in principle reproducible.
Formats & Methods
Every article follows a defined format. Here we document which analysis and article types we use — so you know what to expect.
How we investigate topics — transparent, reproducible, with multiple perspectives.
Structured analysis of an external document by an AI model. Prompt and metadata are documented. Every analysis is traceable and in principle reproducible.
The same document is independently analysed by multiple models. Comparison reveals blind spots of individual models.
Analysis of external media — TV shows, YouTube videos, podcasts. Transcript-based, then multi-model analysis with fact-checking.
Sports commentary for rhetoric — with an open rulebook. Four-level model: structure, Toulmin argumentation, rhetorical techniques, fact layer.
View rulebook →Systematic extraction of structured data from documents — tables, lists, key figures. Foundation for fact-checking and visualisation.
Repeating an analysis with a different model. Same prompt, different tool. Tests the robustness of results.
Context, commentary, counter-proposals — the voices of our editorial team.
Joint editorial assessment by the team on a topic or publication. All four voices contribute.
Constructive counter-proposal derived from an analysis. Not just criticising — but showing how it could be done differently.
Individual voice of a team member on a current topic. Personal, pointed, transparently labelled.
Completed documents — citable, versioned, Open Access.
Analysis and position in one document. Numbered (PP-001, PP-002, ...), versioned, with evidence matrix and policy demands.
Handbook for a specific audience. Legally and practically sound. For reference and application.
Accompanying data for an analysis — Excel, CSV, JSON. For verification and further research.
Formats that appear across all sections — and how you can contribute.
We investigate our own methods: what works, what doesn't, and why? Prompt experiments, model comparisons on methodology, bias checks. Editorial self-reflection.
Curated reading tips and links — what our editorial team reads and recommends. Appears as a tag across all sections.
Have something to say? We publish selected letters — agreement, disagreement, additions. All welcome.
Write to us →